Don't confuse load development and a shooter's ability with barrel capability. Velocity and a cartridge's trajectory, while certainly a benefit against wind, have nothing to do with a barrel's intrinsic accuracy. Wizard requires a lot less work of the shooter.
At Greater distances the longer wand of my Mr. If your framing your point within a shorter radious, then your oracle would prevail. Lighter projectiles run out of inertia quicker than heavier counterparts. Shorter barels will have to step down in trajectory weight to get to the velocity my longer barrel produces. No, you can't do that, because increased velocity and flatter trajectories make a big difference when bucking the wind. Do some research, check out the ammo oracle on this site, and then report back. And how do shorter barrels have a problem "stabilizing heavier projectiles"? The issue is projectile "length", not weight, and unless the barrel is less than it's twist rate I fail to see your stabilization "challange" as described. To clarify, additional fps does not make a barrel more accurate and I challenge you to offer science that proves otherwise. Accuracy has nothing to do with barrel length, increased velocity notwithstanding. Wow, my friend, you are completely wrong. No, accuracy will not be greatly affected by 14.5 inch barrel. If we're talking distances of say 100 yards or less. 14.5" inches and below have more a challenge to stabilize heavier projectiles. Longer length barrels create more velocity creating a flatter trajectory over greater distances than considerably shorter barrels. if covering distances longer than 100 yards. If you are talking iron sights the longer sight radius helps but with a scoped upper there is no difference. With the same good ammo and a good bore the accuracy will be the same though slower FPS out of the shorter barrel. The only difference with a 14.5" high end barrel and a 24" high end barrel is a bit more FPS. Length of the barrel has zero to do with the accuracy it can produce. If you put a standard rail system on an M4, you get lots of options for mounting stuff, and you can actually reduce the impact of how much pressure you put on the barrel when you rest it the bottom rail spreads the pressure out quite well, while a standard handguard makes it focus on the handguard cap.
Free float rail ar15 dan free#
Put a free float on that upper and you can bring your groups down from "really good" to "nobody will believe I shot this!"
I do not see free floating helping practical accuracy in an M4. The specs for both M855 and M193 don't get close enough to 1-2 MOA, and a 14.5" barrel is hardly the correct vehicle to produce tight groups, even with high quality, extremely accurate ammo. Nothing can make an M4 a 1-2 MOA gun if you're shooting GI ammo. So much money is spent on rail systems (guilty here as well), but in the end.is there any real advantage over a MOE handguard? (besides operators that need to attach NVG stuff.)
Let's say the average M4 carbine shoots 2-3 moa with m855 or m193.will adding a free float rail system make it a 1-2 moa gun? Standard 14.5" M4 Carbine (1:7 twist Chrome Lined, etc.) How much of an accuracy difference does installing a "Free Float" rail system make?
0 kommentar(er)
